Free One Liner Notes · The Public Gambling Act, 1867 | One Liner Notes | English Medium
The Public Gambling Act, 1867 | One Liner Notes | English Medium
23 min read
There are 2 Sets of MCQs available for The Public Gambling Act, you are advised to explore all the sets :
Public Gambling Act MCQs Set-1
Public Gambling Act MCQs Set-2
THE PUBLIC GAMBLING ACT, 1867 | |
PREAMBLE | |
| What is the official title of the statute enacted to deal with public gambling? | The statute is titled the Public Gambling Act, 1867. |
| What is the Act number assigned to the Public Gambling Act, 1867? | It is Act No. 3 of 1867. |
| On which date was the Public Gambling Act, 1867 enacted? | The Act was enacted on 25th January, 1867. |
| What conduct does the long title of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 expressly seek to punish? | It seeks to punish public gambling and the keeping of common gaming houses. |
| Which territories are expressly mentioned in the long title as the area of application of the Act? | The United Provinces, East Punjab, Delhi, and the Central Provinces. |
| What is the legal significance of the Preamble in construing the Public Gambling Act, 1867? | It explains the object and purpose of the legislation. |
| What phrase marks the commencement of the operative provisions after the Preamble? | The phrase “It is hereby enacted as follows”. |
| What does section 1 deal with? | Interpretation-Clause |
| What expression is defined under Section 1 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867? | The expression defined is “common gaming-house”. |
| What types of premises are included within the definition of a common gaming-house? | Any house, walled enclosure, room, or place is included. |
| What items must be kept or used in a place to qualify it as a common gaming-house? | Cards, dice, tables, or other instruments of gaming. |
| Is the mere presence of gaming instruments sufficient to constitute a common gaming-house? | No, they must be kept or used for profit or gain. |
| For whose benefit must the profit or gain arise to constitute a common gaming-house? | The profit or gain must arise for the person owning, occupying, using, or keeping such house, enclosure, room or place. |
| Does charging for the use of the premises itself fall within the definition of a common gaming-house? | Yes, charging for the use of the house, enclosure, room, or place is included. |
| What is the significance of the phrase “or otherwise howsoever” in the definition? | It widens the scope to include all forms of profit or gain, irrespective of the method. |
| Does the definition require proof of actual gambling at the time of inspection? | No, keeping or using instruments for profit or gain is sufficient. |
| What does section 2 deals with? | Power to extend Act. |
| Which sections of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 extend automatically to the whole of the said States? | Sections 13 and 17 extend automatically to the whole of the said States. |
| Which authority is empowered to extend the remaining provisions of the Act? | The State Government is empowered to extend the remaining provisions. |
| Is the extension of the remaining sections mandatory or discretionary? | The extension is discretionary, as it depends on the State Government thinking fit. |
| By what mode must the State Government extend the remaining sections of the Act? | By a notification published in the Official Gazette. |
| What is the minimum publication requirement for a notification extending the Act? | The notification must be published in three successive numbers of the Official Gazette. |
| To which areas can the remaining sections of the Act be extended by notification? | Any city, town, suburb, railway-station, house, or place. |
| What is the maximum permissible distance for extending the Act beyond a railway-station? | Not more than three miles from any part of such station-house. |
| Does the Act permit extension to individual houses and places? | Yes, it expressly permits extension to any house or place. |
| What power does the State Government have regarding territorial limits in the notification? | It may define the limits for the purposes of the Act. |
| Can the limits defined under a notification be modified later? | Yes, the State Government may alter the limits from time to time. |
| From which date do the extended provisions of the Act become operative? | From the date of such extension. |
| What happens to existing rules having the force of law upon extension of the Act? | Such rules cease to have effect to the extent of inconsistency or repugnancy. |
| Does every existing rule automatically cease upon extension of the Act? | No, only those rules which are inconsistent with or repugnant to the extended sections cease to have effect. |
| In which territories do inconsistent rules lose their effect after extension? | In the territories to which the extension has been made. |
| What does section 3 deals with? | Penalty for owning or keeping, or having charge of a gaming-house. |
| Who can be held liable under Section 3 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 for operating a gaming-house? | Any owner or occupier, or person having the use of a house, walled enclosure, room, or place situated within the limits to which this Act applies, who opens, keeps, or uses it as a common gaming-house. |
| What conduct constitutes an offence when committed by an owner or occupier under Section 3? | Opening, keeping, or using the premises as a common gaming-house. |
| What additional mens rea is required when liability is based on permitting use by another person? | The owner or occupier must knowingly or wilfully permit such use. |
| Can an owner be punished for allowing another person to run a gaming-house on his premises? | Yes, if he knowingly or wilfully permits it. |
| Who is liable under Section 3 for managerial involvement in a gaming-house? | Any person having care or management of, or assisting in conducting, the business of such gaming-house. |
| Is active management necessary to attract liability under Section 3? | No, even assisting in conducting the business is sufficient. |
| Does Section 3 extend liability to financiers of gambling activities? | Yes, persons who advance or furnish money for gaming purposes are liable. |
| For what purpose must money be advanced to attract liability under Section 3? | For the purpose of gaming with persons frequenting the gaming-house. |
| What is the maximum fine prescribed under Section 3? | A fine not exceeding two hundred rupees. |
| What is the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed under Section 3? | Imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding three months. |
| How is the expression “imprisonment of either description” to be understood? | It has the meaning assigned under the Indian Penal Code, 1860. |
| What does Section 4 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? | It deals with the penalty for being found in a gaming-house. |
| Who can be punished under Section 4 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867? | Any person found in a common gaming-house playing or gaming, or present for the purpose of gaming. |
| What acts constitute gaming under Section 4? | Playing or gaming with cards, dice, counters, money, or other instruments of gaming. |
| Is actual playing necessary to attract liability under Section 4? | No, mere presence for the purpose of gaming is sufficient. |
| Does Section 4 apply only when money or wager is involved? | No, it applies whether gaming is for money, wager, stake, or otherwise. |
| What is the maximum fine prescribed under Section 4? | A fine not exceeding one hundred rupees. |
| What is the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed under Section 4? | Imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding one month. |
| How is the expression “imprisonment of either description” to be understood under Section 4? | It has the meaning assigned under the Indian Penal Code, 1860. |
| What legal presumption is created under Section 4 regarding presence in a gaming-house? | A person found in a common gaming-house during gaming is presumed to be there for the purpose of gaming. |
| Is the presumption under Section 4 conclusive? | No, the presumption is rebuttable until the contrary is proved. |
| When does the presumption under Section 4 arise? | When a person is found in a common gaming-house during any gaming or playing therein. |
| What does Section 5 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? | It deals with the powers to enter and authorise police to enter and search. |
| Which authorities are empowered to act under Section 5? | The Magistrate of a district, any officer invested with full powers of a Magistrate, and the District Superintendent of Police. |
| What is the threshold requirement before action can be taken under Section 5? | The authority must have credible information and reason to believe that the house, walled enclosure, room or place, is used as a common gaming-house. |
| Is prior enquiry mandatory before exercising powers under Section 5? | Yes, such enquiry as the authority may think necessary must be conducted. |
| Can the empowered authority personally enter the suspected premises? | Yes, the authority may himself enter the premises. |
| Can the empowered authority authorise a police officer to conduct the entry and search? | Yes, entry and search may be authorised by warrant. |
| What is the minimum rank of the police officer who may be authorised under Section 5? | An officer not below the rank appointed by the State Government. |
| Can entry under Section 5 be made during night hours? | Yes, entry may be made by night or by day. |
| Is the use of force permitted while entering under Section 5? | Yes, force may be used if necessary. |
| Can persons found in the premises be taken into custody even if not gaming? | Yes, all persons found therein may be taken into custody whether or not actually gaming. |
| What categories of items may be seized under Section 5? | Instruments of gaming, money, securities for money, and articles of value. |
| What standard governs the seizure of money and articles of value? | They must be reasonably suspected to have been used or intended for gaming. |
| Does Section 5 permit the search of concealed places within the premises? | Yes, all parts of the premises may be searched if there is reason to believe gaming instruments are concealed. |
| Can the persons taken into custody be searched under Section 5? | Yes, the persons of those taken into custody may be searched. |
| Is a fresh authority required to seize instruments found during a search? | No, instruments found upon such search may be seized under the same authority. |
| What does Section 6 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? | It deals with Finding cards, etc., in suspected houses, to be evidence that such houses are common gaming houses |
| What factual circumstance triggers the application of Section 6? | The finding of gaming instruments during a lawful entry or search under Section 5. |
| Which items, when found, attract the presumption under Section 6? | Cards, dice, gaming-tables, cloths, boards, or other instruments of gaming. |
| Where must the gaming instruments be found to invoke Section 6? | In the premises searched under Section 5 or on the person of those found therein. |
| What is the first presumption created under Section 6 regarding the premises? | That the premises are used as a common gaming-house. |
| What is the second presumption created under Section 6 regarding persons found therein? | That the persons were present for the purpose of gaming. |
| Is actual gaming required to be witnessed for the presumption under Section 6 to arise? | No, the presumption applies even if no play was actually seen. |
| Against whom can the presumption under Section 6 operate? | Against the house, enclosure, room, or place and the persons found therein. |
| Is the presumption created under Section 6 conclusive? | No, it operates until the contrary is made to appear. |
| Who bears the burden of disproving the presumption under Section 6? | The person against whom the presumption is raised. |
| Does the presumption depend on the personal observation of gaming by the Magistrate or police officer? | No, it applies notwithstanding absence of such observation. |
| What does Section 7 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? | It deals with penalty for giving false names or addresses |
| To whom does Section 7 apply? | It applies to persons found in a common gaming-house entered under the Act. |
| At what stage can a person be required to give his name and address under Section 7? | Upon arrest by a police officer or upon being brought before a Magistrate. |
| Who is competent to demand the name and address under Section 7? | A police officer or a Magistrate. |
| What conduct attracts liability under Section 7? | Refusing or neglecting to give name and address, or giving a false name or address. |
| Is mens rea expressly required for liability under Section 7? | No, refusal, neglect, or falsity itself attracts liability. |
| Before whom must conviction under Section 7 take place? | Before the same or any other Magistrate. |
| What is the maximum monetary penalty prescribed under Section 7? | A penalty not exceeding five hundred rupees. |
| Can costs be imposed in addition to the penalty under Section 7? | Yes, reasonable costs may be imposed as determined by the Magistrate. |
| What happens upon non-payment of penalty and costs under Section 7? | The person may be imprisoned. |
| What is the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed under Section 7? | Imprisonment for a period not exceeding one month. |
| Can imprisonment be ordered even without first ordering payment of penalty and costs? | Yes, imprisonment may be ordered in the first instance if the Magistrate thinks fit. |
| What does Section 8 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? | It deals with on conviction for keeping a gaming-house, instruments of gaming to be destroyed. |
| Upon whose conviction can powers under Section 8 be exercised? | Upon conviction of a person for keeping or using a common gaming-house or being present therein for the purpose of gaming. |
| Which authority is empowered to pass orders under Section 8? | The convicting Magistrate. |
| What order may the Magistrate pass regarding instruments of gaming under Section 8? | He may order all instruments of gaming found therein to be destroyed. |
| Is destruction of instruments of gaming mandatory under Section 8? | No, it is discretionary, as indicated by the word “may”. |
| Can the Magistrate pass orders regarding items other than instruments of gaming? | Yes, he may pass orders regarding securities for money and other articles seized. |
| What action may be taken with respect to securities for money and other articles seized? | They may be sold and converted into money. |
| What may be done with the proceeds of sale and money seized under Section 8? | They may be forfeited. |
| Does the Magistrate have discretion regarding forfeiture of seized money and proceeds? | Yes, he may order forfeiture or direct return in whole or in part. |
| To whom can the Magistrate order the return of money or proceeds? | To persons appearing to be severally entitled thereto. |
| Is the Magistrate bound to return property to the accused upon conviction? | No, return is discretionary and subject to entitlement appearing before the Magistrate. |
| Does Section 8 apply only to persons convicted of keeping a gaming-house? | No, it also applies to persons convicted of being present therein for the purpose of gaming. |
| What does Section 9 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? | It deals with the proof of playing for stakes is unnecessary |
| Is it necessary to prove that gaming involved money, wager, or stake to convict under Section 9? | No, proof of playing for any money, wager, or stake is not necessary. |
| To which offences does Section 9 apply? | Keeping a common gaming-house or being concerned in its management. |
| Does Section 9 alter the substantive offence under the Act? | No, it only affects the proof required to secure conviction. |
| Does Section 9 apply to both owners and managers of gaming-houses? | Yes, it applies to anyone concerned in the management as well as those keeping the house. |
| Is the presence of gaming instruments alone sufficient under Section 9 to support a conviction? | Yes, actual stakes or wagers need not be proved. |
| Does Section 9 limit the presumption created under Section 6? | No, Section 9 supplements the evidentiary scheme but does not limit presumptions under Section 6. |
| What does Section 10 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? | It deals with the power of a Magistrate to require persons found in a gaming-house to be sworn and give evidence. |
| Who can be required to give evidence under Section 10? | Any person found in a house, walled enclosure, room, or place entered under the Act. |
| Before whom can the evidence be required? | Before the Magistrate to whom the person is brought, any other Magistrate, or any Court in proceedings relating to unlawful gaming. |
| On what subjects may the Magistrate examine a person under Section 10? | Evidence touching unlawful gaming in the premises, or acts obstructing, delaying, or preventing entry of a Magistrate or authorised officer. |
| Can a person refuse to answer questions on the ground that it may incriminate him? | No, the person cannot be excused on the ground of self-incrimination. |
| Is the obligation to give evidence limited to the first examination? | No, it extends to any subsequent examination by the same or any other Magistrate or Court relating to the matter. |
| What happens if a person refuses to be sworn, take affirmation, or answer questions under Section 10? | The person shall be dealt with as if committing an offence under section 178 or 179 of the IPC, 1860. |
| Does Section 10 require prior consent of the person for examination? | No, examination is mandatory and lawful regardless of consent. |
| Can the Magistrate compel testimony regarding acts intended to obstruct lawful entry? | Yes, the Magistrate can examine regarding acts preventing, obstructing, or delaying entry. |
| Is the penal consequence under Section 10 for refusal independent of other offences? | Yes, refusal to comply attracts separate IPC-based penalties irrespective of other offences. |
| What does Section 11 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? | It deals with indemnification of witnesses |
| Who is eligible for indemnity under Section 11? | Any person who has been concerned in gaming contrary to the Act and is examined as a witness. |
| Before whom must the person be examined to qualify for indemnity? | Before a Magistrate on the trial of any person for a breach of the Act. |
| What is the key condition for granting indemnity under Section 11? | The person must make a true and faithful discovery to the best of his knowledge, as judged by the Magistrate. |
| Who determines whether the discovery is true and faithful? | The Magistrate before whom the person is examined. |
| What form does the indemnity take under Section 11? | A certificate in writing issued by the Magistrate. |
| From what is the witness freed upon receiving the certificate? | From all prosecutions under the Act for anything done before the time of examination in respect of such gaming. |
| Does indemnity under Section 11 cover future offences? | No, it only covers acts done prior to the examination. |
| Is the issuance of the certificate mandatory once truthful disclosure is made? | It is at the discretion of the Magistrate, based on the opinion that the discovery was true and faithful. |
| Does Section 11 require the witness to confess only partial involvement to receive protection? | No, full and faithful disclosure of all matters examined is required. |
| What does Section 12 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? | It deals with the act not to apply to certain games. |
| Which types of games are expressly excluded from the Act under Section 12? | Any game of mere skill. |
| Does Section 12 restrict the place where games of skill are played? | No, it applies wherever the game is played. |
| Do the provisions of the Act apply to games involving chance under Section 12? | No, Section 12 only excludes games of mere skill; games involving chance remain covered. |
| Is there any exception provided under Section 12 for betting on games of skill? | Section 12 does not mention betting; it only excludes mere skill games from application. |
| Does Section 12 limit the definition of gambling in the rest of the Act? | Yes, by clarifying that mere skill games are not considered gambling under the Act. |
| What does Section 13 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? | It deals with Gaming and setting birds and animals to fight in public streets. |
| Who may apprehend persons under Section 13? | A police officer may apprehend without warrant. |
| Which persons are liable to apprehension under Section 13 for gambling? | Any person playing for money or other valuable thing with cards, dice, counters, or other gaming instruments in a public street, place, or thoroughfare, not being a game of mere skill. |
| Does Section 13 apply to private places? | No, it applies only to public streets, places, or thoroughfares. |
| Who else may be apprehended under Section 13 besides gamblers? | Any person setting birds or animals to fight in public streets, or any person aiding and abetting such fighting. |
| Where must the animals or birds be set to fight to attract liability under Section 13? | In any public street, place, or thoroughfare within the Act's limits. |
| What is the procedure after apprehension under Section 13? | The person must be brought without delay before a Magistrate. |
| What is the maximum fine prescribed under Section 13? | A fine not exceeding fifty rupees. |
| What is the maximum term of imprisonment under Section 13? | Imprisonment, either simple or rigorous, for up to one calendar month. |
| Which instruments may the police seize under Section 13? | Police officer may seize all instruments of gaming found in the public place or on the person of those arrested. |
| Who has the authority to order destruction of seized instruments under Section 13? | The Magistrate may order destruction on conviction of the offender. |
| Is destruction of gaming instruments mandatory under Section 13? | Yes, the Magistrate may order them to be forthwith destroyed upon conviction. |
| Does Section 13 require proof of playing for stakes for apprehension? | Yes, playing must be for money or other valuable thing; mere presence is insufficient. |
| What is the subject matter of Section 14 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867? | Section 14 deals with the offences by whom triable. |
| Which court is competent to try offences punishable under the Public Gambling Act, 1867? | Any Magistrate having jurisdiction over the place where the offence is committed is competent to try offences under the Act. |
| On what basis is territorial jurisdiction determined for trial under Section 14 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867? | Territorial jurisdiction is determined by the place where the offence is committed. |
| Does Section 14 confer unlimited sentencing powers on the Magistrate trying offences under the Act? | No, the Magistrate’s power to impose fine or imprisonment is restricted by the limits of jurisdiction prescribed under the Code of Criminal Procedure. |
| Which procedural law governs the limits of punishment that a Magistrate may impose under Section 14? | The limits of fine and imprisonment are governed by the Code of Criminal Procedure. |
| What is the subject matter of Section 14-A inserted by the Uttar Pradesh State Amendment in the Public Gambling Act, 1867? | Section 14-A deals with the compounding of offences punishable under the Public Gambling Act, 1867 in the State of Uttar Pradesh. |
| Who is competent to compound offences under Section 14-A of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 as applicable in Uttar Pradesh? | An officer specially empowered by the State Government through a notification is competent to compound offences under Section 14-A. |
| Is the power of compounding under Section 14-A absolute in nature? | No, the power of compounding is subject to any general or special orders issued by the State Government. |
| At what stage can an offence under the Public Gambling Act be compounded under Section 14-A? | An offence may be compounded either before or after the institution of prosecution. |
| What is the basis for determining the amount of composition fee under Section 14-A? | The composition fee is determined at the discretion of the empowered officer but cannot exceed the maximum amount of fine prescribed for the offence. |
| What is the legal effect of compounding an offence before the institution of prosecution under Section 14-A? | If compounded before prosecution, the offender shall not be liable to prosecution for such offence. |
| What is the consequence if an offender is in custody and the offence is compounded before prosecution under Section 14-A? | The offender shall be set at liberty if the offence is compounded before the institution of prosecution. |
| What is the legal consequence of compounding an offence after the institution of prosecution under Section 14-A? | Compounding after the institution of prosecution shall amount to acquittal of the offender. |
| Does Section 14-A permit compounding of repeat offences under the Public Gambling Act? | No, Section 14-A expressly prohibits the compounding of any subsequent offence committed by an offender previously convicted under the Act. |
| What is the statutory limitation imposed by the proviso to Section 14-A? | The proviso bars compounding of offences committed by a person who has once been convicted for any offence punishable under the Act. |
| Which State enactment introduced Section 14-A into the Public Gambling Act, 1867? | Section 14-A was inserted by the Uttar Pradesh Act 35 of 1979. |
| What does the provision relating to abatement of certain trials deal with? | It provides for statutory abatement of specified criminal trials and preventive proceedings notwithstanding anything contained in any other law in force. |
| What is the overriding nature of the provision on abatement of certain trials? | It operates notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force. |
| Which category of proceedings is covered under clause (1) of the abatement provision? | Clause (1) covers trials of accused persons for specified offences. |
| Which offences under the Motor Vehicles Act are covered for abatement under this provision? | Trials for offences punishable under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 are covered for abatement. |
| Which offences under the Public Gambling Act, 1867 are excluded from abatement? | Offences punishable under Section 3 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 and wagering offences punishable under Section 13 of that Act are excluded from abatement. |
| Which offences under the Public Gambling Act, 1867 are eligible for abatement under this provision? | All offences under the Public Gambling Act, 1867 except those punishable under Sections 3 and 13 are eligible for abatement. |
| Is an offence under Section 34 of the Police Act, 1861 covered by the abatement provision? | Yes, trials for offences punishable under Section 34 of the Police Act, 1861 shall abate. |
| Is an offence under Section 160 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 covered under the abatement provision? | Yes, trials for offences punishable under Section 160 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 shall abate. |
| Are offences punishable with fine only covered under the abatement provision? | Yes, trials for any other offence punishable with fine only are covered for abatement. |
| Which category of proceedings is covered under clause (2) of the abatement provision? | Clause (2) covers preventive proceedings under Sections 107 and 109 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. |
| What is the condition for abatement of proceedings under Sections 107 and 109 CrPC? | The proceedings must be pending before a Magistrate on the date of commencement of the Act. |
| What is the cut-off date specified for abatement of pending proceedings under Sections 107 and 109 CrPC? | Proceedings pending from before December 31, 2015 shall abate. |
| Does the provision require any judicial discretion for abatement to take effect? | No, abatement takes effect statutorily by operation of law. |
| What is the legal effect of abatement under this provision? | Abatement results in termination of the trial or proceeding without adjudication on merits. |
| Which Uttar Pradesh enactments govern the insertion and amendment of this abatement provision? | The provision was enacted by Uttar Pradesh Act 35 of 1979 and amended by Uttar Pradesh Acts 29 of 2016 and 9 of 2018. |
| What does Section 15 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? | Section 15 provides for the Penalty for subsequent offence. |
| To whom does Section 15 apply under the Public Gambling Act, 1867? | It applies to a person who has already been convicted of an offence punishable under Section 3 or Section 4. |
| Which prior conviction is mandatory for invoking Section 15? | A prior conviction under Section 3 or Section 4 of the Act is mandatory. |
| Is it necessary that the subsequent offence be under the same section as the first offence? | No, the subsequent offence may be under either Section 3 or Section 4. |
| What is the quantum of punishment prescribed for a subsequent offence under Section 15? | The offender is liable to double the amount of punishment applicable for the first offence of the same description. |
| How is the punishment calculated for a subsequent offence under Section 15? | The punishment is calculated by doubling the punishment prescribed for the first commission of an offence of the same description. |
| What is the maximum fine that can be imposed under Section 15? | The fine shall not exceed six hundred rupees. |
| What is the maximum term of imprisonment that can be imposed under Section 15? | The imprisonment shall not exceed one year. |
| What does Section 16 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? | Section 16 deals with the Portion of fine may be paid to informer |
| Which authority is competent to order payment to an informer under Section 16? | The Magistrate trying the case is competent to order such payment. |
| Under which sections’ fines can a portion be paid to an informer under Section 16? | A portion of any fine levied under Sections 3 and 4 may be paid to an informer. |
| Apart from fines, what other amounts can be directed to be paid to an informer under Section 16? | Any part of the moneys or proceeds of articles seized and ordered to be forfeited under the Act may be paid to an informer. |
| What does Section 17 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 deal with? | Section 17 provides for the recovery and application of fines imposed under the Act. |
| How are fines imposed under the Public Gambling Act, 1867 to be recovered? | All fines imposed under the Act are recoverable in the manner prescribed by Section 61 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. |
| 18. [Offences under this Act to be “offences” within the meaning of Penal Code.] Rep. by the Repealing Act, 1874 (16 of 1874), s. 1 and the Schedule, Pt. I. | |
